For most
situations, it can be safe to say that most authors create stories based off
their experiences in life. Keeping that in mind, wouldn’t one assume that an author
got the idea of the “symbolic wound” from a past experience in actual reality? One
shouldn’t think so squarely when thinking about symbolism. So, again, I believe
that the wound is a mark of greatness. Using Foster’s example, who would ever
think that Quasimodo would stand up to anyone. He’s ugly and has a hunched back
that probably prevents him from doing the daily tasks that are easier for the
rest of us to do. Does he use that as an excuse? I don’t think so. He at first
allows the townspeople to be detrimental to his self-esteem, but soon her overcomes
their torture and stands us for himself. Can this fictional reality not be said
for actual reality? Some may allow their shortcomings to deter them from their
goals, but others will fight and prove the people that laughed wrong. This is
the gift of the “symbolic wound”. Saying that the “symbolic wound” can’t be
applied to actual reality is false. In the real world, the wound has different
standards.
The
standards that life gives scaring is far less emphasized than the scaring in
actual literature, but I think you get my point. All in all, I think this makes
things more interesting. People become great because they defy their odds, yes,
but what makes it even better is the fact that they were overlooked. They slowly
grow so the whole world may see them shine. The gift of the “symbolic wound” is
by far the best motivator, in my opinion of course.